RML Example 51: BalancedColumns
RML (Report Markup Language) is ReportLab's own language for specifying the appearance of a printed page, which is converted into PDF by the utility rml2pdf.
These RML samples showcase techniques and features for generating various types of ouput and are distributed within our commercial package as test cases. Each should be self explanatory and stand alone.
First Try at a balancedColumns
We intend to have some content that suddenly splits into two columns
Heading
To characterize a linguistic level L,
this selectionally introduced contextual
feature delimits the requirement that
branching is not tolerated within the
dominance scope of a complex
symbol. Notice, incidentally, that the
notion of level of grammaticalness
does not affect the structure of the
levels of acceptability from fairly high
(e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g.
(98d)). Suppose, for instance, that a
subset of English sentences interesting
on quite independent grounds appears
to correlate rather closely with an
important distinction in language use.
Presumably, this analysis of a
formative as a pair of sets of features is
not quite equivalent to the system of
base rules exclusive of the lexicon. We
have already seen that the appearance
of parasitic gaps in domains relatively
inaccessible to ordinary extraction
does not readily tolerate the strong
generative capacity of the theory.
A Table
alignment | align
alignment |
bulletColor | bulletcolor
bcolor |
bulletFontName | bfont
bulletfontname |
bulletFontSize | bfontsize
bulletfontsize |
bulletIndent | bindent
bulletindent |
firstLineIndent | findent
firstlineindent |
fontName | face
fontname
font |
fontSize | size
fontsize |
leading | leading |
leftIndent | leftindent
lindent |
rightIndent | rightindent
rindent |
spaceAfter | spaceafter
spacea |
spaceBefore | spacebefore
spaceb |
textColor | fg
textcolor
color |
A Title
To characterize a linguistic level L,
this selectionally introduced contextual
feature delimits the requirement that
branching is not tolerated within the
dominance scope of a complex
symbol. Notice, incidentally, that the
notion of level of grammaticalness
does not affect the structure of the
levels of acceptability from fairly high
(e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g.
(98d)). Suppose, for instance, that a
subset of English sentences interesting
on quite independent grounds appears
to correlate rather closely with an
important distinction in language use.
Presumably, this analysis of a
formative as a pair of sets of features is
not quite equivalent to the system of
base rules exclusive of the lexicon. We
have already seen that the appearance
of parasitic gaps in domains relatively
inaccessible to ordinary extraction
does not readily tolerate the strong
generative capacity of the theory.
On our assumptions, a descriptively adequate grammar delimits the strong
generative capacity of the theory. For one thing, the fundamental error
of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as a
corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the
paired utterance test. A majority of informed linguistic specialists
agree that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively
inaccessible to ordinary extraction is necessary to impose an
interpretation on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within
the dominance scope of a complex symbol. It may be, then, that the
speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition appears to correlate rather
closely with the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any
proposed grammar. Analogously, the notion of level of grammaticalness
may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate a general convention
regarding the forms of the grammar.
To characterize a linguistic level L,
this selectionally introduced contextual
feature delimits the requirement that
branching is not tolerated within the
dominance scope of a complex
symbol. Notice, incidentally, that the
notion of level of grammaticalness
does not affect the structure of the
levels of acceptability from fairly high
(e.g. (99a)) to virtual gibberish (e.g.
(98d)). Suppose, for instance, that a
subset of English sentences interesting
on quite independent grounds appears
to correlate rather closely with an
important distinction in language use.
Presumably, this analysis of a
formative as a pair of sets of features is
not quite equivalent to the system of
base rules exclusive of the lexicon. We
have already seen that the appearance
of parasitic gaps in domains relatively
inaccessible to ordinary extraction
does not readily tolerate the strong
generative capacity of the theory.
Further information on the fund is available from the website - www.fundsmith.co.uk. You can also obtain it by calling us on 0330 1231 815 or by writing to Fundsmith LLP, PO Box 10846, Chelmsford, Essex CM99 2BW.
This includes the Supplementary Information Document, the Prospectus, the latest price of shares of the fund, and the latest annual or semi-annual reports as and when they are published. These documents are available free of charge and in English.
This Key Investor Information Document describes the GBP I Class shares. The equivalent document for other share classes is available from the website and address above.
The depositary of the fund is State Street Trustees Limited.
Details of Fundsmith LLP's up to date remuneration policy are available from the website - www.fundsmith.co.uk and include a description of how remuneration and benefits are calculated and the identities of the persons responsible for awarding remuneration and benefits. A paper copy of this information will be made available free of charge on request.
The tax legislation of the United Kingdom may have an impact on the personal tax position of the investor.
We are required, under Money Laundering regulations, to confirm your identity. In the majority of cases, we do this electronically, but we may require additional documents from you if we cannot do this.
Fundsmith LLP may be held liable solely on the basis of any statement contained in this document that is misleading, inaccurate or inconsistent with the relevant parts of the prospectus for the fund.
Further information on the fund is available from the website - www.fundsmith.co.uk. You can also obtain it by calling us on 0330 1231 815 or by writing to Fundsmith LLP, PO Box 10846, Chelmsford, Essex CM99 2BW.
This includes the Supplementary Information Document, the Prospectus, the latest price of shares of the fund, and the latest annual or semi-annual reports as and when they are published. These documents are available free of charge and in English.
This Key Investor Information Document describes the GBP I Class shares. The equivalent document for other share classes is available from the website and address above.
The depositary of the fund is State Street Trustees Limited.
Details of Fundsmith LLP's up to date remuneration policy are available from the website - www.fundsmith.co.uk and include a description of how remuneration and benefits are calculated and the identities of the persons responsible for awarding remuneration and benefits. A paper copy of this information will be made available free of charge on request.
The tax legislation of the United Kingdom may have an impact on the personal tax position of the investor.
We are required, under Money Laundering regulations, to confirm your identity. In the majority of cases, we do this electronically, but we may require additional documents from you if we cannot do this.
Fundsmith LLP may be held liable solely on the basis of any statement contained in this document that is misleading, inaccurate or inconsistent with the relevant parts of the prospectus for the fund.
Further information on the fund is available from the website - www.fundsmith.co.uk. You can also obtain it by calling us on 0330 1231 815 or by writing to Fundsmith LLP, PO Box 10846, Chelmsford, Essex CM99 2BW.
This includes the Supplementary Information Document, the Prospectus, the latest price of shares of the fund, and the latest annual or semi-annual reports as and when they are published. These documents are available free of charge and in English.
This Key Investor Information Document describes the GBP I Class shares. The equivalent document for other share classes is available from the website and address above.
The depositary of the fund is State Street Trustees Limited.
Details of Fundsmith LLP's up to date remuneration policy are available from the website - www.fundsmith.co.uk and include a description of how remuneration and benefits are calculated and the identities of the persons responsible for awarding remuneration and benefits. A paper copy of this information will be made available free of charge on request.
The tax legislation of the United Kingdom may have an impact on the personal tax position of the investor.
We are required, under Money Laundering regulations, to confirm your identity. In the majority of cases, we do this electronically, but we may require additional documents from you if we cannot do this.
Fundsmith LLP may be held liable solely on the basis of any statement contained in this document that is misleading, inaccurate or inconsistent with the relevant parts of the prospectus for the fund.
Further information on the fund is available from the website - www.fundsmith.co.uk. You can also obtain it by calling us on 0330 1231 815 or by writing to Fundsmith LLP, PO Box 10846, Chelmsford, Essex CM99 2BW.
This includes the Supplementary Information Document, the Prospectus, the latest price of shares of the fund, and the latest annual or semi-annual reports as and when they are published. These documents are available free of charge and in English.
This Key Investor Information Document describes the GBP I Class shares. The equivalent document for other share classes is available from the website and address above.
The depositary of the fund is State Street Trustees Limited.
Details of Fundsmith LLP's up to date remuneration policy are available from the website - www.fundsmith.co.uk and include a description of how remuneration and benefits are calculated and the identities of the persons responsible for awarding remuneration and benefits. A paper copy of this information will be made available free of charge on request.
The tax legislation of the United Kingdom may have an impact on the personal tax position of the investor.
We are required, under Money Laundering regulations, to confirm your identity. In the majority of cases, we do this electronically, but we may require additional documents from you if we cannot do this.
Fundsmith LLP may be held liable solely on the basis of any statement contained in this document that is misleading, inaccurate or inconsistent with the relevant parts of the prospectus for the fund.